Abdel Bari Atwan, editor of London’s Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper gauges the winners_and_losers of Israel’s war on Gaza. To some extent, his analysis is predictable: Al-Quds is strongly anti-US foreign policy and I can’t picture Atwan arguing that Israel “won” even if it was clear they had won. Still, he is a highly respected journalist so I outline his scorecard:
1) Israel. Had the biggest losses, if not militarily, then at least politically. After three weeks the IDF could not force Hamas to surrender; And Israel, the region’s strongest military power had to go to Washington to get a security agreement to stop smuggling in Gaza.; Losses drastically in the battle for public opinion, and their actions will significantly fuel recruitment for extremist groups.
2) Egypt. Biggest Arab loser. Lost its role as a mediator amongst Arabs but now even the US and Israel ignore it. Livni and Rice agreed on a security memorandum to stop smuggling in Gaza without even consulting Egypt.
3) Ramallah Based Palestinian Forces. totally marginalized; Supposedly “lost the support of at least half the Arabs as wlel as Iran, Turkey, and Indonesia.”
4) The “Moderate Axis” governments. Lost credibility when it failed to undergo any decisive actions, even facilitated the Israeli aggression
5) Amr Mousa. (Egyptian head of Arab League) Most prominent individual victim; lost serious credibility
6) Pro- Moderate Axis media. lost credibility
Interestingly, Atwan mainly outlines the losers but he doesn’t go into depth on the winners which is probably the more important question and also harder to gauge. But like many of the Arab voices who are highly interested in the Palestinian cause, he is confident that this Gaza operation will add momentum to the cause. He closes out with this paragraph:
هذا العناد في التمسك بالثوابت، وفي رفض الاستسلام هو الذي تخشاه اسرائيل وقيادتها وشعبها، فإذا كان هؤلاء صمدوا ثلاثة اسابيع، ولم يخرج واحد منهم على شاشات التلفزة يندد بالمقاومة، رغم انهيار سلطة ‘حماس’ واختفاء قواتها التنفيذية، وضخامة اعداد الشهداء والجرحى، فإن اداءهم في اي مواجهة قادمة، اذا ما امتلكوا الحد الادنى من الاسلحة الدفاعية، سيكون مفاجئا. فالجيل القادم من ابناء القطاع، الذي سيتكون من اطفال شاهدوا مجازر آبائهم وامهاتهم واشقائهم وشقيقاتهم، سيكون الاشرس، ولن ينسى، ولا نعتقد انه سيغفر
This section goes something like this: “That these people held out for three weeks, despite the collapse of the Hamas executive ability, scares the Israelis. “The coming generation of Gazans which will consist of children who have seen massacres of their mothers and fathers, is going to be alot more vicious/ fiercer. We will not forget and we won’t forgive.”
Atwan brings up a point I’m seeing alot in the Arabic media but not in the US media when it comes to Military analysis. In the 1967 war, the IDF beat the combined resources of all the Arabs combined in 6 days. In the 3 war, Sharon was about 50 km from Cairo and could have gone sightseeing to the Pyramids if he has wanted to. In ’82’ Israel walked all over the PLO forces in South Lebanon and made it to Beirut with little ease. So now they are facing Hamas, a rag-tag militia with massive material and technological disadvantages, but can’t force them to surrender after three weeks? Isn’t this significant from a military perspective?