If you were a radical Jihadist who was lucky enough to get political asylum in Britain, might you think about laying low? Not Hanai Sibai. A former top leader of the Egyptian Jihad group, Sibai takes every opportunity to publicly express his sympathy for Al-Qaeda ideology. For example, last summer, he made an appearance (from London) on the Arab world’s most-watched political talk-show, Al-Itijah Al-Muakis, railing_against_the_evils of secularism. At one point he even goes as far to say that the West calling birds Turkeys- after the name of the Muslim country Turkey, is a sign of how they don’t respect Islam ( go to 3:35 in the clip) … That’s brilliant analysis. HT to Jihadica for pointing this out.
The following December, after Sayyid Imam Al-Sharif published his non-violence initiative, there were probably 40-50 op-eds in the Arabic press analyzing them. About 49 said this is a great thing and a major (and positive) development in the history of the Jihadist movement. Sibai, however, wrote articles in Al-Masri Al-Youm and Al-Hayat bitterly_denouncing Sayyid Imam’s non-violence initiative. Even a lot of his friends were saying “yo, what the hell are you doing?” I remember reading an op-ed by a conservative Jihad sympathizer saying that Sibai needs to keep his mouth shut or he is going to go the way of Abu Hamza and other prominent Euro-Jihadist clerics who pushed the limits too far and are now in jail.
It seems this is about to happen to Sibai. Today, Al-Masri al-Youm, courtesy of info provided by Montaser al-Zayat, reports that the British and Egyptian governments are negotiating Sibai’s extradition back to Egypt from his home of the last 15 years. According to the article, Egypt had been repeatedly making this request for years, but this is the first time during the Gordon Brown administration. Perhaps something has changed the British government’s opinion now.
For his part, Sibai says its not fair and that this is a violation of previous agreements. Please join me in not shedding any tears for Mr. Sibai. I don’t know anything about asylum law, but it seems to me that if, fleeing from a perceived threat, you are given shelter in someone’s house, you should be thankful and keep your mouth shut. Taking the step of very publicly opposing Sayyid Imam’s revisions is blatant terrorism incitement, so in my view he deserves whatever he’s got coming for him.
I’m just disapointed that that we won’t be able to read FANATIC_FACEOFF_II. Sayyid Imam is coming_out_with_a_new_book in response to Zawahiri and Sibai as the sequel to his anti-violence initiative. Something tells me Sibai will not be responding this time around.
Filed under: Uncategorized |